Skinamarink (2022): NOT for Tik-Tok brains..

General Reviews

So from what I've heard, everyone thought Kyle Edward Ball's Skinamarink (2022) was too slow, too grainy and full of too many shots of “nothing”(as it's rated 4.7 on IMDb). I'm writing this article to strongly disagree with all of you and to tell you why everything that was “wrong” with the film actually made it a GREAT film. Not only was it a great film but it fully tapped into childhood nightmares and a very primal feeling of fear, completely immersing me in to the films world. To me, Skinamarink is less of a traditional plot driven film and more of an experience to be had (if your attention span will allow it). It's basically about two young children, Kaylee (Dali Rose Tetreault) and Kevin (Lucas Paul), who wake up in the middle of the night to find their father is missing and all the windows and doors in their home have vanished.

From beginning to end, Skinamarink moves at a pace that slowly creeps along. I felt like this allowed me to settle into the unique viewing experience this film is and built an immense amount of tension for scenes that haven't scared me like that since I was a little kid. As a horror film connoisseur, I've always chased the dragon of feeling scared like I did when I was a child. I remember being 5 years old, waking up in my eerily dark house and looking for my dad to comfort me back to bed. The fear of what was lurking in the shadows and fuzzy black corners of my room would cause my heart to race and my hands to get really sweaty. These fright inducing experiences felt like they would last hours even if I was only awake for a couple of minutes, just as Skinamarink may feel longer than it is. The film contains many “long and drawn-out” shots such as shadowy hallways and dark corners that personally made me feel extremely uneasy throughout the entirety of its runtime (1h40m). So, when the jump-scares or more explicitly frightening scenes came on they had QUITE the impact.

Another thing that really unsettled me during this film were the shots that were “too grainy". Specifically the frames that focused on the darkness under the bed or in a doorway. Sure that created a “low quality” look and you didn't really know what you were looking at but that's exactly what made it more discomforting. You know when you wake up in the middle of the night and you're stumbling to the bathroom in the dark, your eyes strain to adjust but your brain creates ghoulish apparitions out of the grainy blackness. I think Skinamarink brilliantly incorporates that harsh grain to recreate that exact experience. In the film there are many instances where unclear glimpses of faces and bodies appear on screen (or do they?) while the depthless dark continues to morph, this created a sense of dread that was crawling around every corner of the frame.

One of the biggest critiques of Skinamarink  is that there's too many shots of “nothing” happening and maybe at first glance this is true. I believe the films odd angles and poor resolution create a dream-like sensation while also avoiding faces and full characters in frame to deprive you of comfort or connection. I think Kyle Edward Ball made smart decisions with how the film is shown and knew exactly what kind of world he wanted to create. Throughout Skinamarink, what is mostly seen are shots of the children's legs moving around rooms, static dark corners and cartoons on an old tv. This may seem boring if you're not fully invested but while these “boring” shots are happening there's an unearthly voice talking to the children and the jarring sound of toys falling on the ground. These noises alongside not seeing much of what is going on, prompts you to conjure up horrific images of what could be waiting in the dark and I found that to be much more effective than some CGI monster.

At the end of the day if you're looking for an axe-wielding killer, grotesque creatures or an action-packed chase sequence.. you won't find it in Skinamarink. Instead, this film will ask you to recall childhood nightmares and the feeling of desperation for protection against the unknown. This film isn't for everyone but it should resonate with everyone.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments 17

I
IcemoonSeptember 6, 2025
Yeah, I get why people call Skinamarink boring, and I agree, it gets boring haha. But, the grainy shots, the endless dark corners, the weird angles, it really gives off that vibe when I was a kid and scared of my own house at night. spooky as hell.
N
NoScoreAugust 30, 2025
Skinamarink has become one of my all-time horror favorites and is one of the best horror films of this century imo. Filmmaking techniques that tap into something visceral and leave you in the horrors of your own imagination. It is definitely experimental and can ask a lot of you in its breaking of typical genre and film conventions, but so so rewarding if you meet it on its own terms. Great article!
Z
ZedBearMediaAugust 29, 2025
I didn't love the movie as a feature but I would have loved it as a short. It did nail the creeping dread of a dark house at 3am when you're alone. So kudos to the directors for that.
L
Lucas.August 28, 2025
It's one of my favourite tricks for horror movies, using the unseen as a catalyst for horror. It's a trick B-movie directors used to use because they couldn't afford any scary monsters or lavish sets. By putting everything in the dark, it allows the audience's mind to run wild. We naturally fill those dark spaces with our own fears and terrors, allowing each viewer to have their own perspective regarding the fear a movie creates.
V
vanessaonfilmsAugust 21, 2025
really wish i liked this film, but i simply could not enjoy it... would love to give it another shot in the future
M
matteo wAugust 19, 2025
The queen of horror strikes again. This film is awful in my opinion. like how could someone like 100 minutes of grain and muffled voices. YAWN. But i guess you make some pretty good points in your debate.. Tis controversial INDEED!
P
Prof. César MirabalAugust 17, 2025
I liked your article,Emily
U
User-1371925027August 14, 2025
yes as kids world is different, unknown. Very well written :)
G
GulaDaddyAugust 12, 2025
Calling people TikTok brains for not vibing with 100 minutes of grainy ceiling shots is peak film bro energy. That said, Skinamarink absolutely nailed that 3am kid terror when shadows look like monsters. Not everyone wants to stare at static for an hour but when it works, it WORKS. Respect the vision even if it's torture
G
Gwen PemAugust 12, 2025
I agree that it's definitely an experience worth having. I found the "monster under the bed/disorienting fear" thing super effective in the theatre, because of everything you said. For me it didn't hold up on a rewatch though. It's still very effective filmmaking in it's ability to transmit a feeling, though
I
IshikaAugust 12, 2025
ACTHUALLY I have mad TikTok brain rot, and I lovee Skinamarink. It was like a reward for finishing it after how much my brain rotted.
J
Jenn The EditorAugust 12, 2025
All the 'boring' allegations managed to convince me not to watch it when it came out.. but you just changed my mind!!
S
SUNSAugust 12, 2025
I really like your reading of the grainy images and the way the movie utilizes nothingness to elicit a sense of fear. I haven't seen this one yet, but I do love movies that experiment with the form, and this seems like one of them!
B
Brenda EnglishAugust 11, 2025
Excellent Review Em!
L
LucyInTheWoodsAugust 11, 2025
Seems like Skinamarink is all about creating a visceral experience that taps into your fears rather than relying on traditional kinds of scares. Honestly, the most terrifying things are often conjured up by audiences themselves, and the key to a good horror film is to successfully create the suspense and imagined horrors in the viewers indirectly.
M
Matthew EnglishAugust 11, 2025
Another well written article from my super talented daughter 😁
M
Matthew Alan SchmidtAugust 11, 2025
Skinamarink is fantastic, but it's a litmus test film for sure. That "look under the bed" scene is an all-timer.

By this author